Humans are like a flock of birds of the same feathers that have a natural tendancy to change their feathers a lot.What is wrong with sociograms ? They don't catch the way people change their loyalty. I think an election is interesting especially when it was the most massive turn cloak event ever seen in french politic.
-- Coco Chanel while french kissing a gestapo officer ~1943 in Paris
So to solve the lack of tooling for this there is a tool : the chrono sociogram aka : social movie.
First was the persistent map
By feature, dot will correctly guess galaxies of connection that have existed over a long period of time. Hence we begin with a persistent map that is similar to all links set to 1 over a long period of time.Why, because the same way radar maps are useless if cluttered with too much useless informations, you will not care about WHOM talked to WHOM but much more where storms happens, when.
Unreadable ? It is here in SVG.
Well since my corei3 (sorry for being poor and not being able to afford a M1 mac and a GPU for mining bitcoin) is taking 10 hours to generate 243 dot files), imagine how much time it takes to generate the following : a movie out of keeping the persistant image and only changing the color/size of the edge by templating THIS exact picture :D
What is it useful for ?
The first time I worked on this it was in 1997 in ENS as an intern knowing linux in a complex system lab, having a grant on influencing citizen for the « greater good of Political Agricole Commune ».
UE had failed miserably at convincing peasants (red necks) that there interest was in accepting UE money and being enslaved to debt for their life being. With this grant, the network of peasanry and exchange used, sociogram was built and « highly connected nodes » identified. Nowadays we call this « influencers ».
UE just flipped the opinion of a few selected one (ignoring the background of why THEY were selected) and it cascaded in convincing farmers.
This video illustrates like storms, both exchanges in social networks and when/how people turn coats. It is ACTUALLY the very heart of social media.
Hence when I claimed some originality on this work, I point blank lied. However, try to find people sharing their tooling, methodology and you will discover that your public taxes found public research lab which work you can't read and which tools you cant' use on the topic.
Graph problems are NP, exploring graphs require a lot OF CPU, how do meta/FB handle the network analysis I just done for a fraction of the CPU ?
Well, they don't observe the network, they also model it by rewarding people who ARE ALREADY INFLUENCERS in real life thanks to « side channel ». Ex : for publishing videos at the actual quality standards in video and sound processing you need WAY MORE MONEY and better equipment than for writing a blog post that can be done with a 12yo computers. There is a bias of selection of just using the main stream tools.
How can we avoid being influenced ?
Don't : learning of foreign cultures is nice. I love manwhas, mangas and folklore and foreign languages as much as any influencers do. At the opposite of them, though, I give no interest in fame.
What traps you in the web of influence is your the reinforcment of your own bias. Trsuting hyped talkers is a bias..
Have you tried talking to friend of yours about topic on which you disagree and state that you want to explore influence ? Life if polemic. You are better prepared to it by training like a boxer : every day in a pleasant non aggressive mindset like when going to the boxing training. (Yes, I love boxing).
Ivy league education prepare to this thanks to « concours d'éloquence », it's also if you notice the core of how slang culture treat the others.
Now that I finished a project I wanted to do for long, I think my sociogram time is other, and I may do a last topic on the making (and thus introduce my bash sort of makefile and how with perl oneliner I templatized a dot file to create a usable template for python because this trick is serverly disgusting (I mean FUN).
Real life stuff
All the spoke persons even though they were not the ones spied on of the government did have a very active involvments while being paid by tax payers money. It may be legal, it does not look moral when the same one advocates for better spending of the tax money. When you are receiving public money for one reason to support your expenditures to either be a public servant or a representant of the people, you don't work for private interests on the side. But well, we neither call french state l'Assiette au beurre (the plate of butter) for nothing, nor Paris Paname without a reason : it's because of this lingering kind of corruptions scandals that don't kind of motivate you to vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment